*Pages 1--4 from Microsoft Word - 54496.doc* PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th St., S. W. Washington, D. C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418- 0500 Fax- On- Demand 202 / 418- 2830 TTY 202 / 418- 2555 Internet: http:// www. fcc. gov ftp fcc gov DA 06- 126 January 24, 2006 ENFORCEMENT BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON AT& T, INC. SECTION 272 BIENNIAL AUDIT REPORT IN EB DOCKET NO. 03- 199 Comments due: March 27, 2006 Pursuant to section 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (“ Communications Act”), 1 the Commission has authorized AT& T Inc. (“ AT& T”) 2 to enter the in- region interLATA market in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, California, Nevada, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin. 3 Section 272 of the Communications Act requires Bell Operating Companies to offer in- region, interLATA service through separate affiliates that comply with certain structural, nondiscrimination, and accounting safeguards. Section 272( d) requires a biennial audit. 4 We have received the results of the biennial audit of 1 47 U. S. C. § 271. 2 SBC Communications Inc. changed its corporate name to AT& T Inc. effective November 18, 2005. 3 See Application by SBC Communications Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc, d/ b/ a Southwestern Bell Long Distance Pursuant to Section 271 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Provide In- Region, InterLATA Services in Texas, CC Docket No. 00- 65, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 18354 (2000); Joint Application by SBC Communications Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc. d/ b/ a Southwestern Bell Long Distance for Provision of In- Region, InterLATA Services in Kansas and Oklahoma, CC Docket No. 00- 217, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 6237 (2001); Joint Application by SBC Communications Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc. d/ b/ a Southwestern Bell Long Distance Pursuant to Section 271 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Provide In- Region, InterLATA Services in Arkansas and Missouri, CC Docket No. 01- 194, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 20719 (2001); Application by SBC Communications Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc., for Authorization to Provide In- Region, InterLATA Services in California, WC Docket No. 02- 306, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 25650 (2002); Application by SBC Communications Inc., Nevada Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc., for Authorization to Provide In- Region InterLATA Services in Nevada, WC Docket No. 03- 10, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 7196 (2003); Application by SBC Communications Inc., Michigan Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc., for Authorization to Provide In- Region, InterLATA Services in Michigan, WC Docket No. 03- 138, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19024 (2003); and Joint Application by SBC Communications Inc., Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Indiana Bell Telephone Company Incorporated, the Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Wisconsin Bell, Inc., and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc., for Authorization to Provide In- Region, InterLATA Services in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Wisconsin, WC Docket No. 03- 167, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 21543 (2003). 4 47 U. S. C. § 272( d). 1 2 AT& T’s operations in all of its in- region states for the period July 10, 2003 through July 9, 2005. The audit report, “Report of Independent Accountants on Applying Agreed- Upon Procedures – AT& T Inc.,” was submitted by Ernst & Young LLP on December 19, 2005. Section 272( d)( 2) of the Communications Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available. 5 We now invite comments on the AT& T audit report. In accordance with section 53.213( d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. 6 Accordingly, comments are due no later than March 27, 2006. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit- but- disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure. 7 FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. 8 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to . Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket or rulemaking number. Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e- mail. To get filing instructions for e- mail comments, commenters should send an e- mail to ecfs@ fcc. gov, and should include the following words in the body of the message, "get form